The Evidence Based Chiropractor Blog
Hundreds of chiropractic marketing and research articles to help you grow.
Archive
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- October 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- October 2021
- January 2021
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- February 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
Lumbar Stenosis- by The Evidence Based Chiropractor
A recent (2014) study in SPINE examined the use of decompression without fusion for lumbar stenosis. They found that decompression without fusion can be just as effective as methods involving fusion, but has significant cost saving advantages and fewer complications. Generally, this decompression is accomplished by a laminectomy.
If fusion is warranted, they encourage the use of bone graft as opposed to instrumentation (hardware). It seems as though bone grafting is also more cost effective while providing similar outcomes. The study found that complication rates rose significantly for patients who underwent a laminectomy with fusion compared to those who just received a laminectomy.
It makes sense to me that limiting the use of instrumentation/hardware would yield decreased complications and perhaps even slight outcomes advantages. Instrumentation (while necessary with certain procedures) permanently alters the bio-mechanics of the spine and places vertebral segments adjacent to the surgical site at increase risk for degeneration.
Additionally, I believe it is important to stress that previous research has shown that chiropractic care (specifically flexion/distraction technique) has provided relief from lumbar stenosis. The complication rate for conservative chiropractic care is significantly lower than surgical intervention, and both have proven to be effective treatments. The degree, or amount of stenosis (and its impact on function) will play a large role in determining whether conservative care is an option for each individual patient. The bottom line is that physicians should be aware that surgical intervention is not the only treatment option available for patients with lumbar stenosis.
-The Evidence Based Chiropractor is the leading DC/MD marketing and outreach group in the world. Our service is dedicated to increasing chiropractic utilization by showcasing research. Marketing to medical doctors through research is efficient, cost effective, and can dramatically improve your incoming referrals. Join us. Lets grow chiropractic together.