The Evidence Based Chiropractor Blog
Hundreds of chiropractic marketing and research articles to help you grow.
Archive
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- October 2022
- July 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- October 2021
- January 2021
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- February 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- February 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
87% of Patients Experiencing Pain Two Years After Spinal Surgery- by The Evidence Based Chiropractor
Shocking that nearly 87% of people who have spinal surgery experience pain two years later.
Becker Spine produced an extremely informative piece on Cigna's recent report on lumbar spinal fusions. You can find the piece below and a direct link at the bottom.
Many patients unfortunately believe that lumbar fusion will result in local pain relief. The goals of lumbar fusion are typically to provide stability and provide relief from radicular pain. This disconnect may account for some of the 87% of patients who were still experiencing pain two years post-surgery. In any case, papers like the one below show us that patients should exhaust ALL conservative care prior to surgery in non-emergency situations. Build the interdisciplinary relationships necessary to ensure your neighbors are afforded every option prior to surgery.
From Becker Spine, "In 2011, Cigna examined spinal fusion patients and found 87 percent of customers who had fusions were still experiencing pain and undergoing additional therapies or drugs two years later, according to a report from the Tampa Bay Times.
The article questioned whether other insurers and Medicare would follow suit. Here are five findings from the report:
1. Almost 15 percent of patients who underwent spinal fusions had more surgery. A study of Medicare claims from 2005 to 2009 shows readmission rates for spinal stenosis decompression were 8 percent to 10 percent with and without fusion, according to a Medscape report.
2. The total cost of post-surgery claims was $11 million. An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality statistical brief shows spinal fusions are one of the costliest procedures in the United States. In 2011, spinal fusions cost an average of $12.8 million, with the average cost per hospital stay at $27,600. There were around 465,000 hospital stays for spinal fusion in 2011.
3. Cigna tightened coverage after seeing the results of the report. Several other insurance companies have changed their coverage protocol over the past few years, adding stricter indications for spinal fusion. Earlier this month, anarticle in a local Kansas newspaper reported that the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas made spinal fusion coverage changes in 2013 and one year later patients feel their access to care is limited even after multiple in-network surgeons deem the procedure medically necessary.
4. Medicare doesn't have upfront approval for spinal fusions, but can recover money for surgery later deemed unnecessary. A report shows Medicare improperly spent $120 million on lumbar fusions in 2012. The tighter indications for spinal fusion and a challenging reimbursement market led Research and Markets to predict the United States' share of the spinal fusion market will shrink from 71 percent in 2013 to 63 percent in 2020. At the same time, developing markets are expected have larger growth; China will gain 5 percent market share, making their entire market share 10 percent in 2020.
5. A Dartmouth Atlas Health Care report found where patients get surgery depends more on where they live and how surgeons practice medicine there than overall protocol for medical necessity. The report examines Medicare enrollees in 2002 and 2004, showing surgical rates varied by a factor of more than 20 across the country. Spinal fusion rates were highest in these areas:
• Idaho Falls, Idaho
• Missoula, Montana
• Mason City, Iowa
• Bradenton, Florida
• Casper, Wyoming
The rates were lowest in these areas:
• Bangor, Maine
• Covington, Kentucky
• Terre Haute, Indiana
• Grand Forks, North Dakota
• Newark, New Jersey
The report also found that in 80 hospital referral regions, lumbar fusion rates were around 30 percent higher than the United States average. However, in 98 hospital referral ranges, rates were more than 25 percent lower than the national average."
http://www.beckersspine.com/spine/item/21289-cigna-reports-15-of-spinal-fusion-customers-undergo-2nd-surgery-5-key-points
-The Evidence Based Chiropractor is the leading DC/MD marketing and outreach group in the world. Our service is dedicated to increasing chiropractic utilization by showcasing research. Marketing to medical doctors through research is efficient, cost effective, and can dramatically improve your incoming referrals. Join us. Lets grow chiropractic together.
The Business of Spinal Fusions- by The Evidence Based Chiropractor
Spinal fusions are big business in the United States. In 2013, over 87% of the surgical spinal procedures involved a fusion. The US performs over double the amount of yearly fusions compared to Canada, the United Kingdom, Western Europe, and Australia. Nearly 500,000 fusion are being performed this year (nearly 250,000 were performed in 2001).
Are these procedures providing superior outcomes for our patients? It would appear the answer is no.
In 2006, a Medicare physicians panel found that "it was less than reasonably likely that spinal fusion would provide a long-term benefit for patients suffering from degenerative disc disease." Medicare never translated this finding into their policies, however, other insurers have picked up on the fact that spinal fusion utilization may be far greater than its effectiveness.
Blue Cross & Blue Shield has now excluded spinal fusion as a covered procedure for degenerative disc disease without gross instability. They recommend at least 3 months of conservative spine care. Cigna also has a similar recommendation. Even the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery said “increasing success and optimism may be leading some surgeons to overuse procedures beyond what the current state of medical evidence really supports.” Also of note is between 2006-2009 the cost of a spinal fusion nearly doubled. This is in part due to the surgical implant companies increasing the pricing of instrumentation.
Many health care facilities are building multidisciplinary health care centers. These spine centers include medical doctors, chiropractors, and other allied health practitioners. Preliminary data shows that these spine centers are providing a higher quality of care, with great patient satisfaction, good outcomes, and a model of care based on best practice and evidence based guidelines for spine care. Whether or not a spinal fusion is right for you is a decision to be made between you and your doctor. However, growing evidence would suggest that conservative spine care may be more effective for many individuals.